#Simplenote notes disappeared free
OK, so I didn’t completely free myself from Googles’ grip. But I will probably still be looking for that perfect “Google Notebook” as a low priority. I will likely continue to use it because the mobile application interfaces are so stellar. Now when I want to find it I can open tag search then:Ī) Select ITM6 and browse the names until I see “ITM6 Info – Port Usage”.b) Select Ports and browse the names until I see “ITM6 Info – Port Usage”. For the note in the example above I set tags to make finding it easy: ITM6, Ports. Example: “ITM6 Info – Port Usage” where this note is in the space “IBM/Tivoli”.
Here are some usage notes that make working in Catch efficient: Not huge, but would be nice on those occasions when a picture is worth a thousand words. The tagging system coupled with clever note naming mitigates this to some extent, but it would still be nice. This would enable the division of a notebook into sections of related notes. What would I like to see, aside from the above three complaints: For me, I find myself setting the first line into text that breaks into two sections (section – subject). Note names are taken from the first line of the note.Clever use of CAPS and symbols (-, *, etc) helps but really isn’t a substitute. There is no ability to mark text up richly (ie: bold, italics, bullets, etc).Web interface locks the width of notes to a pre-set size.I set colors based on type of topic which makes it easier to find things. It’s on par with Evernote thanks to their use of tags. It’s faster than Evernote, especially the web version. Nice interface on all platforms (web, iPhone, iPad).With the free version you’re alloted so many with the ability to “earn” more via referrals. I replicated all my notes to Catch and decided to use it for a while and see if it fulfilled my needs. Add reminder, picture, note, voice memo, or checklist (which is implemented well). The iPhone and iPad apps are very nice and intuitive as well. They have a decent web front end with only a couple of minor annoyances, but overall it’s a pretty slick service. It’s a note application that is geared toward efficient use on mobile devices (ie: not the desktop or web). Their iPad application is a giant poo fest as well.Ī few months ago I discovered Catch. With that growth it has become slower and bulkier. Over time Evernote has grown a lot through company acquisitions and feature enhancements. I still use OneNote at work and only to store material that cannot be stored anywhere else due to policy, but that’s it – no sync anywhere. OneNote had all the features I need, but I don’t like the desktop application – at all. Simplenote also fell short in the way it implemented rich text markup. Simplenote did not have folders, only tags, but did manage notes fairly well. I ended up migrating to Evernote after trying a couple of other solutions, including Simplenote and Microsoft OneNote. Evernote is close, very close, but not quite the same. I’ve tried a number of different solutions over the last few years, but none have felt quite like Google Notebook did. You can’t use it all now: Google Notebook FAQ. At any rate there would be no more improvements to it. The let you keep Notebook for some time but you couldn’t use it if you didn’t already have Notebook service. Docs is meant to be an online Office suite and it fills that role nicely enough, but it doesn’t manage notes (documents) into notebooks (folders) very well. While similar, they are distinctly different. I guess they felt there was overlap in the services, who knows. About the time Google released Docs they announced Notebook would be discontinued.
It had rich text, managed folders, multiple notes, blah blah blah. A long time ago I used Google Notebook for managing all my notes.
0 kommentar(er)
